Generation Z's Experience of Shifting Digital Ethics on Social Media

Authors

  • Muhammad Thariq Iqbal Habibi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya image/svg+xml Author
  • Erfanda Andi Mada Arectya Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya image/svg+xml Author
  • Kenneth Sulthon Alafi Al Hallaj Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya image/svg+xml Author
  • Eka Firmansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

Digital Ethics, Generation Z, Moral Crisis, Digital Literacy, Social Media

Abstract

This study theoretically examines the shift in knowledge authority within higher education during the Artificial Intelligence (AI) era through the lens of Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy. The widespread use of generative AI among university students raises concerns regarding learner passivity and the relevance of Freire’s framework in understanding this epistemic shift. Utilizing a qualitative conceptual analysis, this study examines Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed alongside indexed scientific literature from 2023-2026. The findings reveal three main patterns: a shift in epistemic authority from lecturer to AI, a transformation of learning interactions into a triangular lecturer AI student relationship, and two potential educational trajectories strengthening critical dialogue or reproducing banking education through technology. The discussion demonstrates that while generative AI cannot serve as a conscious dialogue partner, it can function as codified material or a generative theme to be critically examined. Thus, Freire's approach remains highly relevant provided AI is positioned as a spark for human dialogue rather than its final product. Ultimately, this study proposes the concept of 'shifting epistemic authority' as a new analytical framework for higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] UNICEF. (2023). Annual Report 2023: Information and Communication Technology Division. UNICEF.

[2] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

[3] UNESCO. (2021). Media and information literate citizens: Think critically, click wisely! (2nd ed.). UNESCO.

[4] Ogburn, W. F. (1964). On culture and social change. University of Chicago Press.

[5] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

[6] Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.

[7] Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

[8] Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

[9] Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). Harper & Row.

[10] Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Generation Z’s Experience of Shifting Digital Ethics on Social Media. (2026). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(01). https://jurnal.haizumsaintek.com/index.php/H-Dynamics/article/view/46