The Shift in Epistemic Authority in Higher Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Theoretical Analysis through Paulo Freire's Critical Pedagogy
Keywords:
Epistemic Authority, Critical Pedagogy, Paulo Freire, Artificial Intelligence, Higher EducationAbstract
This study theoretically examines the shift in knowledge authority within higher education during the Artificial Intelligence (AI) era through the lens of Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy. The widespread use of generative AI among university students raises concerns regarding learner passivity and the relevance of Freire’s framework in understanding this epistemic shift. Utilizing a qualitative conceptual analysis, this study examines Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed alongside indexed scientific literature from 2023-2026. The findings reveal three main patterns: a shift in epistemic authority from lecturer to AI, a transformation of learning interactions into a triangular lecturer AI student relationship, and two potential educational trajectories strengthening critical dialogue or reproducing banking education through technology. The discussion demonstrates that while generative AI cannot serve as a conscious dialogue partner, it can function as codified material or a generative theme to be critically examined. Thus, Freire's approach remains highly relevant provided AI is positioned as a spark for human dialogue rather than its final product. Ultimately, this study proposes the concept of 'shifting epistemic authority' as a new analytical framework for higher education.
References
[1] Santoso, M. A., Humaidy, R. I., Safitri, N. H., & Khusumadewi, A. (2026). Analisis Penggunaan Teknologi AI sebagai Referensi Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. 9, 683–692.
[2] Sihombing, G. C. (2026). Analisis Dampak Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence Berbasis Chatbot secara Berlebihan. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1), 1–10.
[3] Citraningrum, M., Rophi, A. H., & Haka, N. B. (2026). Integrasi ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran Biologi: Tantangan dan Peluang di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JP-IPA), 7(01), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.56842/jp-ipa.v7i01.762
[4] Thalib, D., Karnain, N., Labaso, C., & Tudja, S. R. (2026). Analisis Ketergantungan Penggunaan AI Generatif Berbasis Large Language Models di Kalangan Mahasiswa. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 12(1), 85–92.
[5] Freire, P. (1972). Pendidikan Kaum Tertindas (I. Ahmad, Ed.; 7th ed.). Penerbit Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.
[6] Costa, C., Murphy, M., & Costa, C. (2026). Critical education, generative artificial intelligence and the tyranny of freedom: A critique of modern "technocracy." Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 35(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2025.2547728
[7] Saputra, M. A., Bogor, U. T., & Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D. (2026). Analisis Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. 3(1), 290–295.
[8] Chasanah, I. A. W., & Sudrajat, S. (2026). Transformasi Pendidikan di Era Digital: Telaah Filosofis tentang Teknologi, Pendidikan, dan Kemanusiaan. SOCIETY, 17(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.20414/society.v17i1.14737
[9] Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (19th ed.). ALFABETA, CV.
[10] Mubarok, M. (2026). Penyusunan Peta Literatur Penelitian: Strategi Penelusuran, Kriteria Inklusi-Ekslusi, dan Sintesis Sumber Ilmiah. Tuladha: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(1), 67–70.
[11] Khusnuliawati, H., & Dwi Retnoningsih, A. C. (2026). Peningkatan Literasi Etis Penggunaan Generative AI pada Mahasiswa Universitas Sahid Surakarta. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multidisiplin, 9(2), 390–398.
[12] Hanindah, & Fiyul, A. Y. (2026). Analisis Perencanaan Pendidikan Tinggi Inovatif dan Berkelanjutan di Era Transformasi Digital. 1(3), 319–324.
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2026-09-08 (2)
- 2026-08-18 (1)
