This is an outdated version published on 2026-08-18. Read the most recent version.

The Think-Pair-Share Model on Correlation Analysis: An Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes Improvement

Authors

  • Nabila Zulfa Rahmawati Author
  • Erfan Yudianto Author
  • Sasqia Ulimaz Maghfiroh Author
  • Eko Yudi Febriyanto Author

Keywords:

Cooperative, Student Learning Outcomes, Student Participation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model in improving student learning outcomes and participation. The method used is quantitative research with a pretest-posttest design. The research subjects consisted of students who participated in learning with the TPS model, while the instruments used included learning outcome tests and student activity observation sheets. The results of the study showed that the application of the TPS model was able to significantly improve student learning outcomes, which was shown by the increase in average scores and the acquisition of N-Gain in the medium to high category. In addition, student participation in the learning process has also increased, especially in discussion and opinion delivery activities. However, there is a variation in improved learning outcomes between students, which shows that not all students experience an equal improvement. The conclusion of this study is that the Think Pair Share learning model is effective in improving student learning outcomes and participation, and can be used as an alternative innovative learning strategy to create more active and collaborative learning.

Author Biography

  • Nabila Zulfa Rahmawati

    Departement of Mathematics Education

References

[1] OECD, “PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia PUBE,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.

[2] C. Batanero, M. M. Gea, M. del M. Lopez-Martin, and P. Artega, “An�lisis de los conceptos asociados a la correlaci�n y regresi�n en los textos de bachillerato,” Didacticae, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1344/did.2017.1.60-76.

[3] A. Petersen, “Developing Students’ Intuition on the Impact of Correlated Outcomes,” Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 154–164, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/26939169.2022.2074584.

[4] N. Suharto, S. Sukmawati, and M. Assaibin, “Ethnomathematics-Based Contextual Learning to Improve Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability,” Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 552–564, May 2026, doi: 10.51574/kognitif.v6i2.5005.

[5] M. Bächtold, P. Roca, and K. De Checchi, “Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards cooperative learning, and their relationship to motivation and approach to learning,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 100–112, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2022.2112028.

[6] J. G. Tullis and R. L. Goldstone, “Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?,” Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 15, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5.

[7] N. Michinov, É. Anquetil, and E. Michinov, “Guiding the use of collective feedback displayed on heatmaps to reduce group conformity and improve learning in Peer Instruction,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1026–1037, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12457.

[8] L. Mundelsee and S. Jurkowski, “Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 88, p. 102015, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015.

[9] N. H. Marhaeni, S. V. Ramos, T. Triyadi, and B. Sudarmaji, “The Effect of Think Pair Share Learning Model to Improve Studentâ€TMs Problem-Solving Ability,” Jurnal Mercumatika : Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 2, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.26486/jm.v6i2.3032.

[10] K. I. L. Storm, L. K. Reiss, E. A. Guenther, M. Clar-Novak, and S. L. Muhr, “Unconscious bias in the HRM literature: Towards a critical-reflexive approach,” Human Resource Management Review, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 100969, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100969.

[11] R. W. Khairunisa and Basuki, “Perbandingan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa antara Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS dan CIRC,” Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 113–124, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31980/plusminus.v1i1.881.

[12] M. Mernawati, Y. N. Harahap, and R. Susanti, “Pengaruh Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (TPS),” FARABI: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 74–79, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.47662/farabi.v4i1.92.

[13] Y. D. Hommy, C. S. Ayal, and D. A. Ngilawajan, “PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL,” Sora Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 42–49, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.30598/sora.2.2.42-49.

[14] C. Büscher, “Students’ Development of Measures,” 2019, pp. 27–50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03472-6_2.

[15] T. L. Toh, “School calculus curriculum and the Singapore mathematics curriculum framework,” ZDM – Mathematics Education, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 535–547, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11858-021-01225-6.

[16] Sugiyono, “METODE PENELITIAN KKUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R&D,” 2013.

[17] J. W. . Creswell, Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. PHI Learning Private Limited, 2013.

[18] E. Firmansyah and A. Ikhwan, “Inclusive Education as a Catalyst for Social Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review.”

[19] K. M. Cooper, J. N. Schinske, and K. D. Tanner, “Reconsidering the Share of a Think–Pair–Share: Emerging Limitations, Alternatives, and Opportunities for Research,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. fe1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200.

[20] Tarisa Putri, Joni Albar, and Kasihani Lestari, “The Effect of Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning on Students’ Conceptual Understanding in IPAS Learning at SDN 28,” Journal Innovative Practices in Education (JIPE), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 179–183, May 2026, doi: 10.58540/jipe.v1i3.1612.

[21] N. M. Webb et al., “Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 63, pp. 79–93, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001.

[22] V. Hoogerheide, L. Deijkers, S. M. M. Loyens, A. Heijltjes, and T. van Gog, “Gaining from explaining: Learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 44–45, pp. 95–106, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.005.

[23] J. Dunlosky, K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham, “Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–58, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.

[24] A. Triyono, R. H. Nuary, N. Permatasari, Y. Yuni, and T. Wibowo, “The Level of Effectiveness of TPS and Conventional Methods Judging from Students’ Geometry Learning Results Using the N-Gain Test,” AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 125, May 2024, doi: 10.30595/alphamath.v10i1.21530.

[25] G. M. Reed, W. D. Spaulding, and L. F. Bufka, “The relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to mental disorders and their treatment,” Alter, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 340–359, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2008.11.003.

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-18 — Updated on 2026-08-18

Versions

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 02 (2026): August

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Think-Pair-Share Model on Correlation Analysis: An Analysis of Student Learning Outcomes Improvement. (2026). International Journal of Education and Cultural Transformation, 1(02). https://jurnal.haizumsaintek.com/index.php/sundano/article/view/56